Re: archives.postgresql.org change

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, w^3 <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org change
Date: 2008-02-24 18:41:22
Message-ID: 26CC3949FE19C44CF3529DDD@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Perfect, just wanted to make sure ...

- --On Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:35:54 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:24:36 -0400
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> - --On Sunday, February 24, 2008 10:42:45 +0100 Dave Page
>> <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Yeah, me too. I know we were aiming to upgrade svr5, but don't
>> > recall any chatter about moving the archives generation. Marc
>> > normally just moves VMs to a FreeBSD 6 host and upgrades them.
>>
>> Actually, I had asked Joshua to do this months ago ... figured it
>> made more sense to pull justhte mbox files to the archives server and
>> regen, then pull them to an intermediary box, and then have archives
>> pull the generated files ... the middle step didn't make much
>> sense ...
>>
>> > Yeah, I'm not sure what they all were, but I do remember Marc
>> > spending a bunch of time hacking stuff around on Oleg & John's
>> > advice to optimise the way Google & other search engine index the
>> > archives. I don't know if all that customisation is stuff that can
>> > be rsync'd.
>>
>> The only thing that that should have affected would have been
>> the .resource file ... Joshua, we did copy that over, right?
>
> I have the following:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 archives archives 8041 Jul 13 2006 .resource-new
> -rw-r--r-- 1 archives archives 7856 Aug 9 2006 .resource-old
>
> Which contain a bunch of mhonarc macros (at least that is what it looks
> like). It is called from mk-mhonarc like so:
>
> if [ `echo $month | awk -F. '{print $2}'` -le 200607 ]; then
> resourcefile=.resource-old
> else
> resourcefile=.resource-new
> fi
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
> --
> The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
>

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHwbpS4QvfyHIvDvMRAhFYAJ0UrYH3jF3MdE4AgfgsYvSRsI03uQCcC4wa
MyN85lOf3QWhVfXcfCOMJWs=
=8BqQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-02-24 23:19:18 Re: Huh? What is this?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-24 18:35:54 Re: archives.postgresql.org change