Re: Calling for a replacement committer for GROUPING SETS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Calling for a replacement committer for GROUPING SETS
Date: 2015-03-09 18:54:18
Message-ID: 26993.1425927258@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> In the light of Tom's comment in <22996(dot)1425919278(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Tom> I will admit that I'm been slacking on commitfest work. This is
> Tom> not unrelated to the fact that we've been in commitfest mode
> Tom> continuously since last August. I'm afraid whatever enthusiasm I
> Tom> had for reviewing other peoples' patches burned out some time ago.

> I'm now requesting that some other committer take on the grouping sets
> patch. Any takers?

FWIW, "slacking" doesn't mean "I've abandoned Postgres work completely".
I'm almost out from under some work-related deadlines (modulo the odd
plpgsql performance improvement patch or two ;-)) and expect to get
back to your patch and others in the CF before too long.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-03-09 19:06:24 Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-03-09 18:50:32 Re: alter user/role CURRENT_USER