From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local |
Date: | 2006-05-05 18:41:47 |
Message-ID: | 26992.1146854507@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The attached patch checks for the file, and either user it or generates
> a log message that it was skipped.
I still can't get excited about this. Who will it help? The DBA who is
silly enough to think his ancient SSL library supports CRL is probably
also silly enough not to read the postmaster log carefully. It would
make a whole lot more sense just to document that OpenSSL < whatever
doesn't support CRL.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-05 18:51:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-05 18:28:13 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support if local |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-05 18:51:05 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't try to compile SSL CRL support |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-05 18:29:03 | Re: [PATCHES] Adminpack contrib module |