Re: locking/performance, Solaris performance discovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: locking/performance, Solaris performance discovery
Date: 2003-10-06 14:30:14
Message-ID: 26975.1065450614@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> writes:
> I've started profiling and running tests... currently it is leaning
> towards the sysv semaphores. I see in src/backend/port/ that pg_sema.c is
> linked to the sysv implementation.

Does Solaris have Posix semaphores? You could try using those instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Fuchs 2003-10-06 15:08:36 Re: count(*) slow on large tables
Previous Message Jeff 2003-10-06 13:33:57 locking/performance, Solaris performance discovery