Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Asif Naeem <anaeem(dot)it(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max
Date: 2014-08-29 02:39:22
Message-ID: 2694.1409279962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for your review. Please find the rebased patch to latest HEAD.

Committed with minor (mostly cosmetic) alterations.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-08-29 11:28:54 Re: BUG #11280: Segmentation fault in dataPlaceToPageLeaf at gindatapage.c:645
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-08-28 23:00:57 Re: [BUGS] BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-08-29 03:05:39 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-08-29 02:37:19 Re: possible optimization: push down aggregates