Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting
Date: 2017-01-28 21:40:15
Message-ID: 26935.1485639615@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> What I liked about it is that it makes it a bit easier to compare the
> estimate and actual for each node.

Hmm, you'd have to make some effort to line up those fields, if you
wanted that to be a thing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-01-28 22:18:48 Re: pg_hba_file_settings view patch
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-01-28 21:31:10 Re: proposal: EXPLAIN ANALYZE formatting