Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Corner case for add_path_precheck
Date: 2015-02-10 15:07:34
Message-ID: 26924.1423580854@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> The special case is that the path passed to add_path_precheck() has costs
> *equal to* those of the old_path. If pathkeys, outer rells and costs are the
> same, as summarized in the comment above, I expect add_path_precheck() to
> return false. Do I misread anything?

It does, so I don't see your point?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-10 15:21:53 Re: For cursors, there is FETCH and MOVE, why no TELL?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-02-10 14:23:02 Re: Parallel Seq Scan