Re: [BUG FIX] Uninitialized var fargtypes used.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG FIX] Uninitialized var fargtypes used.
Date: 2019-11-12 21:59:32
Message-ID: 26920.1573595972@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2019-Nov-12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If we're going to revert 0a52d378b03b we should just treat the
>> problem straightforwardly. I was imagining ...

> I pushed using that approach.

You missed cleaning up func_get_detail, but I took care of it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-11-12 22:20:39 Re: [PATCH] 32x32 and 48x48 favicons
Previous Message legrand legrand 2019-11-12 21:41:15 Re: BUG #16109: Postgres planning time is high across version - 10.6 vs 10.10