Re: s_lock.h default definitions are rather confused

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: s_lock.h default definitions are rather confused
Date: 2015-01-10 22:17:05
Message-ID: 26906.1420928225@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Given you got the error above, you used gcc.

Right.

> Have you used non-gcc
> compiler on hppa recently? I seem to recall you mentioning that that
> doesn't work sanely anymore? If so, perhaps we can just remove the !gcc
> variant?

I'll try that shortly ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-01-10 22:58:10 Re: s_lock.h default definitions are rather confused
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-01-10 22:03:36 Re: s_lock.h default definitions are rather confused