From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/src/interfaces/libpq Makefile |
Date: | 2003-04-22 03:39:18 |
Message-ID: | 26881.1050982758@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why? libpq doesn't use rename, and I don't think it should be using
> Also, keep in mind that it will effect other clients who do use
> rename/unlink. The question is whether they assume Unix semantics on
> those commands. I don't know the answer, but I assumed they did.
I don't believe any of our standard clients care, and in any case libpq
is not the place to put it if they do.
>> unlink (someone *please* tell me that that unlink in getaddrinfo_unix
>> is a brain-dead error...)
> Not sure --- that's why I added it.
Even if it's correct (which I doubt) it's inside #ifdef
HAVE_UNIX_SOCKETS and therefore irrelevant to Windows.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-22 03:49:38 | Re: pgsql-server/src/interfaces/libpq Makefile |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-04-22 03:26:13 | Re: pgsql-server/src/interfaces/libpq Makefile |