| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: One less footgun: deprecating pg_dump -d |
| Date: | 2009-03-21 22:16:32 |
| Message-ID: | 26818.1237673792@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
It seemed that the majority opinion in this thread was to eliminate
the confusion by dropping the short form "d" switch in pg_dump and
pg_dumpall --- if you want that behavior you'll have to write
"--inserts".
For consistency I suggested also dropping the short form switch
"D" for "--column-inserts", although this is not absolutely necessary
in terms of eliminating a conflict.
Last chance for objections ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-22 00:35:57 | Re: Can we drop ABSTIME? |
| Previous Message | Michael Renner | 2009-03-21 18:32:23 | Documentation Update: WAL & Checkpoints |