Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-15 14:04:59
Message-ID: 26812.1502805899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 8/14/17 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we could commit add-connected-event-2.patch and call this
>> issue resolved.

> Would you like to commit your patch then?

It's really Andres' patch, but I can push it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-08-15 15:07:43 Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-15 14:01:44 Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-15 14:12:48 Re: [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Previous Message Chris Travers 2017-08-15 14:03:41 Re: Orphaned files in base/[oid]