| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Dunstan <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 16:07:43 |
| Message-ID: | 2679.1207843663@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Or :)
> I can open a web browser, go to tracker.postgresql.org,
> review the list of open patches, click one, download, review, comment,
> upload new patch if required, done.
And then no one sees your revised patch (except someone watching the
tracker like a hawk). This is not the way to have a discussion,
which is fundamentally what our process is.
As I said before, I am uninterested in any proposals for a fundamental
change in our processes. I want an index page that makes sure that
nothing that's supposed to get done in a commit fest gets forgotten.
I do not need what you propose, and I wouldn't voluntarily use it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-10 16:09:14 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-10 16:02:29 | Re: Commit fest queue |