Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs
Date: 2020-05-19 13:32:15
Message-ID: 26737.1589895135@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> While digging into my backlog, I have found this message from Peter E
> mentioning about $subject:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e6aac026-174c-9952-689f-6bee76f9ab68@2ndquadrant.com

> It seems to me that it would be a good idea to make those checks more
> consistent, and attached is a patch.

Hm, I'm pretty certain that data_directory does not need this because
canonicalization is done elsewhere; the most that you could accomplish
there is to cause problems. Dunno about the rest.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-19 13:51:36 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Previous Message Kenneth Marshall 2020-05-19 13:28:34 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?