Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Bryan Roberts <bryan(at)aotea(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'
Date: 2004-12-13 18:33:11
Message-ID: 26720.1102962791@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Added to TODO for Win32:
> o Allow the shared memory address to be configured via GUC
> This is something we knew might be required and now I think it is
> required. Using a fixed address was always pretty crazy.

I see no proof of that at all in this bug report. The postmaster has
evidently managed to create the segment, so the address per se is not
the problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-13 18:40:14 Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-13 18:00:25 Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'