Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm. The problem I've got with this is that then mean_query_len means
>> something significantly different after entry_dealloc than it does
>> after gc_texts.
>>
>> I'd be okay with changing *both* of those functions to ignore sticky
>> entries in the calculation, if that seems reasonable to you.
> That seems perfectly reasonable, yes. Should I leave that to you?
Sure, I can take it.
regards, tom lane