Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Steve Prentice <prentice(at)cisco(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2009-10-08 17:21:16
Message-ID: 26618.1255022476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> It's just the call notation -- the function only needs to know what
>> arguments it got for which parameters.

> So they're still ordered? I'm thinking of PL/Perl here

It's PL-independent as far as I know --- if you find something where it
doesn't work, that's a bug.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-10-08 17:26:10 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-10-08 17:19:03 Re: COPY enhancements