| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-22 23:30:31 |
| Message-ID: | 26552.1064273431@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Fair enough. On another front then... would all this energy we are
> talking about with pg_upgrade
> be better spent on pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore?
Well, we need to work on pg_dump too. But I don't foresee it ever
getting fast enough to satisfy the folks who want zero-downtime
upgrades. So pg_upgrade is also an important project.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ray Higdon | 2003-09-22 23:34:23 | Re: career in SQL/Database administration |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2003-09-22 23:12:37 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL |