| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
| Date: | 2016-03-03 05:04:24 |
| Message-ID: | 26539.1456981464@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I agree that it would be good to get this in as soon as possible. I'm
> currently very close to being done with writing Parallel Aggregate on
> top of the upper planner changes. So far this version is much cleaner
> as there's less cruft added compared with the other version,
Cool! If you come across any points where it seems like it could be
done better or more easily, that would be tremendously valuable feedback
at this stage.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2016-03-03 05:07:25 | Re: On columnar storage (2) |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2016-03-03 04:54:36 | Re: Issue with NULLS LAST, with postgres_fdw sort pushdown |