Re: script binaries renaming

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: script binaries renaming
Date: 2008-03-24 19:59:01
Message-ID: 26525.1206388741@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Where are we on this? Tom thinks we don't want this. TODO has:
> * Prefix command-line utilities like createuser with 'pg_'
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00025.php

> I think we need to make a decision.

Well, I don't have any particular objection to adding pg_ prefixes
as alternate names for the existing scripts. However, it's not clear
what is the point unless we have the intention to remove the old names
at some time in the foreseeable future. And the consensus of the
previous thread on -patches seemed to be that nobody except Zdenek
was very eager to do that.

In any case, there is no value in discussing this further on -patches
since the readers of this list already weighed in. If you want to
make a decision then it needs to be made on -hackers or -general.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-03-24 20:19:42 Re: script binaries renaming
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-24 19:52:09 Re: gcc 4.3 breaks ContribCheck in 8.2 and older.

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2008-03-24 20:09:53 actualised execute using patch
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-03-24 19:01:15 generate_subscripts