Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, alexk <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Postmaster holding unlinked files for pg_largeobject table
Date: 2011-06-04 16:49:05
Message-ID: 26510.1307206145@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> What surprises me is that the open references remain after a database
> drop. Surely this means that no backends keep open file descriptors to
> any table in that database, because there are no connections.

bgwriter ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Ribe 2011-06-04 17:50:12 recommendations on storage, fairly low-end
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-04 16:41:48 Re: Why are IDLE connections using cpu according to TOP.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-04 16:55:45 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Previous Message Hitoshi Harada 2011-06-04 16:47:27 Re: Pull up aggregate subquery