| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures |
| Date: | 2007-06-12 20:29:55 |
| Message-ID: | 26489.1181680195@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> The only additional idea I have is that we ought to simply strip away any
>> e-mail footer over 4 lines from the archives. Not only would this purge the
>> confidentiality footers, it would save us some space in general.
> The effort it would take to write some code to extract the messages from
> the archive mboxes, break up the messages into their component parts,
> strip excess sig lines, reconstruct the messages, reconstruct the mboxes
> and then regenerate the archives would probably equate in dollar value
> to the disk space required for another 40 or 50 years worth of archives.
A more serious objection is that any automated tool would probably get it
wrong sometimes, and strip important text.
> I vote 'lets not bother'
Right. I agree with Josh's idea about mentioning list policies in the
subscription confirmation message, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry McGhaw | 2007-06-12 20:40:19 | Re: Selecting a constant question |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-06-12 20:17:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2007-06-12 20:32:02 | moving from gborg to pgfoundry & mailing list administration |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-06-12 20:17:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures |