Re: OSX & Performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: postgres performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OSX & Performance
Date: 2005-08-28 20:00:49
Message-ID: 26476.1125259249@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeff Trout <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> writes:
> Tracking ti down a bit timestamp_cmp_internal (The btree was made of
> a timestamp & and int) was taking a large amount of time -
> specifically all the calls it makes to isnan(x). 14.1% in __isnand

Hmm, can you provide a test case for other people to poke at?

> Also, two things to note, one of which is quite important: On tiger
> (10.4) PG compiles with NO OPTIMIZATION. Probably a template file
> needs to be updated.
> Panther seems to compile with -O2 though.

I see -O2 when building PG (CVS tip) on a fully up-to-date 10.4.2
machine. Maybe something odd in your environment, like a preset
CFLAGS setting?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ilia Kantor 2005-08-28 20:41:18 intarray is broken ? (8.1b1)
Previous Message Arjen van der Meijden 2005-08-28 14:44:37 Re: Inefficient queryplan for query with intersectable