Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to
Date: 2004-08-15 15:40:18
Message-ID: 26468.1092584418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> There's another question this bug raises, though. Why doesn't the server
> protest when it sees more copy data passed in after it sees the end marker?

Whether it did or not would make not the slightest bit of difference,
since (without the patch) psql isn't going to be looking for an error
response.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 15:57:09 Re: Savepoint weirdness
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 15:32:49 Re: pg_dump 'die_on_errors'

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-15 16:11:16 Re: [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-15 15:32:49 Re: pg_dump 'die_on_errors'