Re: Deadlock bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, glue(at)pgexperts(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Deadlock bug
Date: 2010-08-20 20:19:17
Message-ID: 26464.1282335557@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> In principle we don't need to sharelock the referencing row in either
> update in this example, since the original row version is still there.

s/referencing/referenced/ ... sorry bout that ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-08-20 20:23:10 Re: [Glue] Deadlock bug
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-08-20 20:16:25 Re: Version Numbering