| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: table partitioning and access privileges |
| Date: | 2020-01-30 17:57:52 |
| Message-ID: | 26451.1580407072@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020/01/31 1:28, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On 2020/01/31 1:02, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Sorry for not having paid closer attention to this thread, but ...
>>> is back-patching this behavioral change really a good idea?
> I'm thinking to wait at least half a day before reverting
> the back-patch just in case someone can give opinion
> during that period.
Sure, other opinions welcome. We still have a week before the
back-branch releases.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-01-30 18:03:46 | Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-01-30 17:45:13 | Re: table partitioning and access privileges |