Re: Testing with concurrent sessions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Date: 2010-01-07 16:38:12
Message-ID: 26444.1262882292@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> We could even bundle DBI and DBD::Pg to ensure that the minimum versions
> are there.

As a packager, my reaction to that is "over my dead body". We have
enough trouble keeping our own software up to date, and pretty much
every external component that we've started to bundle has been a
disaster from a maintenance standpoint. (Examples: the zic database
is constant work and yet almost never up to date; the snowball stemmer
never gets updated.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-07 16:46:35 Re: pg.dropped
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-07 16:37:12 Re: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values