Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date: 2010-06-08 03:01:06
Message-ID: 26431.1275966066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But I think that we don't need to specify other than the wildcard
> in the database field of .pgpass to use the replication-specific
> password if the replication-specific user is supplied in .pgpass.
> So the current code is enough for me. Am I missing something?

You're looking at it from the perspective of somebody who knows
exactly how the code works. What Andrew tried is exactly what
95% of other people would try. There doesn't seem to me to be
any very good argument against making it work for them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-08 03:16:12 Re: Functional dependencies and GROUP BY
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-08 02:52:15 Re: SR slaves and .pgpass