Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Date: 2007-02-20 14:23:13
Message-ID: 26429.1171981393@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... Yes. The HOT-updated status of the root and all intermediate
> tuples is cleared and their respective ctid pointers are made
> point to themselves.

Doesn't that destroy the knowledge that they form a tuple chain?
While it might be that no one cares any longer, it would seem more
reasonable to leave 'em chained together.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 14:23:30 Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2007-02-20 14:20:35 Re: ToDo: add documentation for operator IS OF

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-20 14:23:30 Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-02-20 13:16:51 Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements