From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "nonint(at)yandex(dot)ru" <nonint(at)yandex(dot)ru>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tutorial from Chapter 2.1 |
Date: | 2025-08-10 15:48:19 |
Message-ID: | 2640299.1754840899@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sunday, August 10, 2025, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Possibly we should reword the tutorial intro a bit, to the effect
>> that you can follow along with the examples if you have a source
>> tree at hand. (Sadly, that's not going to be very many novices
>> these days.)
> I’d rather remove it from the docs and make a home for it in the wiki or,
> probably better, have a separate git repository that they could clone.
Making it buildable standalone would be a significant investment
of effort I fear. Right now it's dependent on the autoconf/makefile
infrastructure of the surrounding Postgres source tree.
The other problem would be keeping it in sync with the tutorial
docs proper. I guess we could pull those out of the main
documentation altogether, and make "the Postgres tutorial" into
a fully standalone project. But I'm not detecting a lot of
enthusiasm for doing the work.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-08-12 23:16:40 | Index / glossary adjustments for Git & GUC |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-08-10 15:40:27 | Re: Tutorial from Chapter 2.1 |