Re: Small fix for inv_getsize

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
Date: 2000-11-02 19:19:02
Message-ID: 26386.973192742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Denis Perchine <dyp(at)perchine(dot)com> writes:
> you wrote. Except VARATT_IS_EXTENDED check (is it neccessary, can I store
> data and be sure that it is not toasted? I do not like this for BLOBs).

Yes, it's necessary *and* appropriate. LO data won't be moved off,
because pg_largeobject doesn't have a toast table (unless the user makes
one), but it can be compressed.

> All other seems the same... Please give me an example of this check...

The loop only has to loop till it finds a valid tuple.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-02 20:35:57 Re: Small fix for inv_getsize
Previous Message Denis Perchine 2000-11-02 18:29:28 Re: Small fix for inv_getsize