| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |
| Date: | 2010-04-20 14:05:09 |
| Message-ID: | 26365.1271772309@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> http://blog.metasploit.com/2010/02/postgres-fingerprinting.html
> Assuming the situation really is as described here, I am wondering if
> we should suppress the F, L, and R output in this and similar cases
> and back-patch it all the way back. This seems like it is entirely
> too helpful.
[ yawn.. ] I'm unimpressed: should we also ensure that neither ASCII
nor translated texts of authentication failure messages ever change?
IIRC, you were lobbying *for* such a change only a day or two ago.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-20 14:08:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-20 14:01:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |