Re: Operators and schemas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Operators and schemas
Date: 2002-04-15 20:31:02
Message-ID: 26317.1018902662@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> We could make some sort of escape syntax, like

> op1 myschema.operator(+) op2

I thought a little bit about that ... the above syntax does not work
but it looks like we could do something along the lines of

op1 OPERATOR(myschema.+) op2

where OPERATOR has to become a fully reserved keyword.

But: do you really want to see all dumped rules, defaults, etc in that
style? Ugh... talk about loss of readability...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-15 20:55:57 Re: RFC: Generating useful names for foreign keys and checks
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-15 20:04:07 Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts