| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Date: | 2022-12-04 15:25:23 |
| Message-ID: | 2629670.1670167523@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2022-12-03 Sa 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. Bikeshedding on my name choices is welcome. I know Robert is
>> dissatisfied with "ereturn", but I'm content with that so I didn't
>> change it here.
> details_please seems more informal than our usual style. details_wanted
> maybe?
Yeah, Corey didn't like that either. "details_wanted" works for me.
> Soon after we get this done I think we'll find we need to extend this to
> non-input functions. But that can wait a short while.
I'm curious to know exactly which other use-cases you foresee.
It wouldn't be a bad idea to write some draft code to verify
that this mechanism will work conveniently for them.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sayyid Ali Sajjad Rizavi | 2022-12-04 15:28:30 | [PATCH] Add .idea to gitignore for JetBrains CLion |
| Previous Message | Ankit Kumar Pandey | 2022-12-04 13:34:24 | Re: Questions regarding distinct operation implementation |