Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Date: 2020-04-10 15:37:02
Message-ID: 2627.1586533022@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Over at https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/172c9d9b-1d0a-1b94-1456-376b1e017322@2ndquadrant.com
> Peter Eisentraut suggests that pg_validatebackup should be called
> pg_verifybackup, with corresponding terminology changes throughout the
> code and documentation.

> Here's a patch for that. I'd like to commit this quickly or abandon in
> quickly, because large renaming patches like this are a pain to
> maintain. I believe that there was a mild consensus in favor of this
> on that thread, so I plan to go forward unless somebody shows up
> pretty quickly to object.

+1, let's get it done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-04-10 15:37:25 Re: Report error position in partition bound check
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2020-04-10 15:20:37 Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join