Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Antje(dot)Stejskal(at)ppi(dot)de, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?
Date: 2004-12-20 18:15:29
Message-ID: 26263.1103566529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's not quite too late to make TimeZone be one of the GUC_REPORT
>> settings in 8.0, if that would help your problem.

> Well this just kind of reverses the problem, now Java must have the same
> set of timezones as the zic database, but I think making TimeZone a
> GUC_REPORT is a good idea because we may want to go that route down the
> line and now we certainly want to detect if someone has manually set the
> TimeZone behind our backs.

OK, done for 8.0.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-12-20 18:43:25 Re: Patch to reduce the number of messages to translate
Previous Message Barry Lind 2004-12-20 17:15:03 Re: Bug in JDBC-Driver?