mike g <mike(at)thegodshalls(dot)com> writes:
> If you post more details about how the transaction being executed you
> might get more replies from others on the list. Pretty tough to give a
> definitive answer based on the info below.
In particular, the quoted log segment only shows that this single
command executed successfully; it very possibly could have been part
of a larger transaction that later failed and was rolled back.
I think Frank is in error to suppose that his updates are "not wrapped
in a transaction".
regards, tom lane