| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fork/exec |
| Date: | 2004-02-02 01:11:34 |
| Message-ID: | 26218.1075684294@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> writes:
> Nice. Could perhaps also get it to do the ugly and oft repeated
> setitimer(ITIMER_PROF, &prof_itimer, NULL) and beos_backend_startup() bits,
> which currently contribute greatly in making the post-fork code unclear.
Good point.
> Flip you for it? :-)
Go for it, I've got plenty on my plate already ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-02 01:23:46 | Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-02 01:06:54 | Re: Q: How ORDER BY is being done inetrnally? |