Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

On 2016/12/17 11:32, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:02 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Aside from the above, I found few other issues and fixed them in the
>>> attached patches. Descriptions follow:
>>
>> To avoid any further mistakes on my part, can you please resubmit
>> these with each patch file containing a proposed commit message
>> including patch authorship information, who reported the issue, links
>> to relevant discussion if any, and any other attribution information
>> which I should not fail to include when committing?
>
> I think it's a good advice and will keep in mind for any patches I
> post henceforth.
>
> In this particular case, I found all the issues myself while working
> with some more esoteric test scenarios, except the first patch (1/7),
> where I have mentioned in the description of the patch in the email,
> that there were independent reports of the issue by Tomas Vondra and
> David Fetter.

Here are updated patches including the additional information.

Thanks,
Amit