Re: Pull up aggregate subquery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pull up aggregate subquery
Date: 2011-05-25 20:08:57
Message-ID: 26200.1306354137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think getting it working is probably a good first goal. I am not
> really sure that we want to commit it that way, and I think my vote
> would be for you to work on the approach we discussed before rather
> than this one, but it's your project, and I think you'll probably
> learn enough in getting it working that it will be a step forward in
> any case. The planner is complex enough that it's worth trying to get
> something that works, first, before trying to make it perfect.

Remember Brooks' advice: "Plan to throw one away. You will anyhow."

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-05-25 20:42:03 Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-25 20:07:55 Re: about EDITOR_LINENUMBER_SWITCH