Re: PHP stuff

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PHP stuff
Date: 2005-03-17 18:47:31
Message-ID: 26196.1111085251@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> writes:
>> In my mind the real reason we stick "Copyright PGDG" in the sources is
>> just as a prophylactic against someone putting their own copyright on
>> the files and then trying to prevent anyone else from using the code.
>> Effectiveness of this measure remains to be seen ;-)

> What's the point of the copyright in the first place? Why not explicitly
> put it in the public domain like SQLite?

We can't, because we can't revoke Berkeley's copyright. But in practice
there's hardly any difference anyway.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2005-03-17 18:47:40 Re: PHP stuff
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-17 18:42:56 Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for