Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28
Date: 2018-05-22 23:00:29
Message-ID: 26187.1527030029@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Well diagnosed. Maybe it's worth pointing out that almost all the
> examples of perl_run() in the perlembed manual simply ignore the
> returned value. OTOH, if that's what we're supposed to do why isn't the
> function declared that way?

Yeah, it seems that mainly what they're doing is trying to resolve
the confusion about that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-05-22 23:39:58 Re: Error on vacuum: xmin before relfrozenxid
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-05-22 22:56:36 Re: plperl fails with perl 5.28