Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: dennis jenkins <dennis(dot)jenkins(dot)75(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql 9.0.6 backends pruning process environment?
Date: 2012-02-15 15:18:02
Message-ID: 26178.1329319082@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 06:40, dennis jenkins
> <dennis(dot)jenkins(dot)75(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I recently updated my Gentoo Linux development system from postgresql
>> 9.0.4 to 9.0.6-r1 (9.0.6 plus some Gentoo specific patches). One of
>> my 'C' language functions (been using it for years) stopped working
>> because the backend no longer had access to the PGDATA environment
>> variable. A snippet of code is included below.

> I suggest you look at the version history of the gentoo packaging and
> scripts instead. My guess is that something was changed there.

Yes. A PG backend will not remove a "PGDATA" envar, but *it does not
set it either*. This sounds to me like a change in the startup script.

> You can look at the configuration variable data_directory, or use the
> C symbol DataDir which is exported from the backend.

Quite --- at the C level, looking at DataDir is the right thing, and
looking at PGDATA could be misleading even if it exists --- consider
the possibility that we took the data_directory setting from the
command line or postgresql.conf.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-02-15 15:20:35 Re: [GENERA]: Postgresql-9.1.1 synchronous replication issue
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2012-02-15 14:31:45 Re: Memory tuning Postgres