| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocati |
| Date: | 2026-06-02 03:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | 26143834-FB1D-4DB8-9106-99A8CC16C34F@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
> On Jun 2, 2026, at 02:32, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2026-May-29, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
>
> My apologies -- I failed to attribute co-authorship of this patch to Chao
> Li per the other thread,
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/D8D9F770-DAA2-482C-A7E0-F87E5104C13E%40gmail.com
>
No worries, that’s not a problem at all.
> Generally speaking, it would be helpful for patch authors to add the
> appropriate "Discussion:", "Author:" and "Reviewed-by:" trailers to
> commit messages. I tend to rewrite commit messages almost entirely
> before pushing, but I'd normally preserve the trailers.
>
Yes, I agree. I usually try to keep those trailers up to date in my patches, as I think that may make things a bit easier for committers.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-02 04:15:55 | Re: injection_points: Switch wait/wakeup to use atomics rather than latches |
| Previous Message | Henson Choi | 2026-06-02 03:05:41 | Re: Row pattern recognition |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-06-01 20:03:24 | pgsql: Stamp 19beta1. |