Re: pruning disabled for array, enum, record, range type partition keys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pruning disabled for array, enum, record, range type partition keys
Date: 2018-04-18 22:56:31
Message-ID: 26114.1524092191@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I now wonder if there's anything else that equivclass.c or indxpath.c
> can teach us on this topic.

I've been meaning to review this but have been a bit distracted.
Will try to look tomorrow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2018-04-18 23:31:50 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-04-18 22:37:30 Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on