Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Aakash Goel <aakash(dot)bits(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)
Date: 2012-04-28 15:06:53
Message-ID: 26104.1335625613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Translating WAL is a very hard task.

No kidding. I would think it's impossible on its face. Just for
starters, where will you get table and column names from? (Looking at
the system catalogs is cheating, and will not work reliably anyway.)

IMO, if we want non-physical replication, we're going to need to build
it in at a higher level than after-the-fact processing of WAL.
I foresee wasting quite a lot of effort on the currently proposed
approaches before we admit that they're unworkable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-04-28 15:12:19 Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-28 11:08:42 Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)