Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Date: 2017-03-06 12:28:33
Message-ID: 2605f6d0-8444-528e-4e38-6b13968cfeb7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/6/17 03:33, Michael Banck wrote:
> Would this be a candidate for backpatching, or is the behaviour change
> in pg_dump trumping the issues it solves?

Unless someone literally has a materialized view on pg_policy, it
wouldn't make a difference, so I'm not very keen on bothering to
backpatch this.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-06 12:30:16 Re: objsubid vs subobjid
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-06 12:22:41 Re: Foreign Join pushdowns not working properly for outer joins