Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: On naming of executables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Davidson <chemosh9(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On naming of executables
Date: 2012-09-06 20:19:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
Mark Davidson <chemosh9(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As a new user of Postgres I'm wondering about the naming of certain
> executables (createdb, dropuser, etc). These are fairly ambiguous
> names. They could just as well apply to the OS or an other DBMS. Why
> not prefix them? (e.g. `pg_createdb` such as several other scripts).

Yeah, if people had thought ahead fifteen years ago they would surely
have been named like that.

At this point, though, it seems like the costs of changing would
outweigh the benefits.  (I recall at least one fairly serious proposal
to rename them, but it didn't pass, and now there are even more years
of precedent there.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Grant MartinDate: 2012-09-08 08:33:24
Subject: Insert Statement & Composite Type
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2012-09-06 19:56:26
Subject: Re: On naming of executables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group