| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
| Date: | 2002-04-05 18:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | 25986.1018030036@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> I could take a look at this. Any guidance other than "faithfully
> preserving the contents of a C string"?
Take textin/textout, remove multibyte awareness? Actually the hard
part is to figure out which of the existing hardwired calls of textin
and textout would need to be replaced by calls to unknownin/unknownout.
I think the assumption UNKNOWN == TEXT has crept into a fair number of
places by now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 18:21:41 | Re: 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2002-04-05 17:23:26 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 18:21:41 | Re: 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-04-05 17:21:42 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |