Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wal_sender_delay is still required?
Date: 2010-12-06 15:08:21
Message-ID: 25969.1291648101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Walsender doesn't need the periodic wakeups anymore, thanks to
> the latch feature. So wal_sender_delay is basically useless now.
> How about dropping wal_sender_delay or increasing the default
> value?

If we don't need it, we should remove it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-12-06 15:14:55 Re: Suggesting a libpq addition
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-12-06 14:58:41 Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump